Info

Posts from the Uncategorized Category

Choose another category?

On Saturday, March 23, we invited the great Timothy “Speed” Levitch to lead a tour of Anthony Baab’s exhibition “A Strenuous Nonbeing.” If you know Speed or his work, you know that this would not be your average tour. Speed used the opportunity to bring attendees into “the land of the liminal” where Baab’s work lives.

In an interactive workshop with Baab’s work as a springboard, participants listened to Speed’s musings on “the inbetween” as fodder to create visual poems using a variety of materials. The visitors took to the task with gusto, creating some interesting work of their own in the process!

Speed Levitch regales visitors with his thoughts on Anthony Baab’s clod paerati.

Despite the weather the crowd was pretty thick, topping out around 40 participants!

Visitors listening to Speed waxing philosophical about Anthony’s work and the concept of “the liminal.”

Workshop participants using materials at hand to create visual poems.

Participants responded to the task in various ways, often bringing their poems into the third dimension.

A sampling of the diverse approaches used by the participants.

Left to right: Artist Anthony Baab, Timothy “Speed” Levitch, and workshop participant.

Please join us for these rousing public events offered in conjunction with Anthony Baab’s A Strenuous Nonbeing! All events will be free, open to the public and held on site at Grand Arts.

From The Concrete Into The Liminal: A Free Tour of Anthony Baab’s Exhibition led by Timothy Speed Levitch

Saturday, March 23rd 3-4 PM @ Grand Arts
This event is free and open to the public, but space is limited. Please email gallery@grandarts.com to reserve a space.

This will be a one hour tour split into two acts – Act One takes us outside, into the concrete world of Grand Arts’ parking lot and the sidewalk out front. Here, we will have an opportunity to hang out and empathize with some of the “real” objects that dwell in this very transparent world. Then, Act Two takes us back inside Grand Arts, where we’ll enter the liminal world of Anthony Baab’s exhibit and do a compare/contrast between the lives of the “real” objects dwelling outside of Grand Arts and the lives of the unfeasible objects of Baab’s world that are currently dwelling inside Grand Arts.

Timothy “Speed” Levitch, a native of Kansas City and New York City, is an iconoclastic philosopher, tour guide and writer. Currently, Speed is the host of Richard Linklater’s Hulu documentary series “Up to Speed” and renowned as the cult star of Bennet Miller’s 1998 documentary The Cruise. Levitch is a true lover of the city, history and theater.

One Person’s Temple is Another Cat’s Sandbox

Saturday, March 30th 3 – 4 PM @ Grand Arts
This event is free and open to the public

In Anthony Baab’s A Strenuous Nonbeing, one of his mysterious architectures is haunted by a coterie of feline presences. What business do these cats have there? Are they guides? Captives? Squatters? All of these? Perhaps the cats serve as ciphers, illuminating more about about “us” than they reveal about “themselves.”

Grand Arts emissaries Seth Johnson and Lacey Wozny will use Baab’s work as a starting point to link seemingly disparate themes and existential queries arising from the above concerns. Topics will include: cat furniture as high modernism; Lonesome George and the ethical presumptions of zoos; how a polar bear family and a flock of sea gulls colonized a model Soviet outpost; cultural literacy through great misunderstandings, and more….

Artist, researcher, and A Strenuous Nonbeing brochure essayist Stephen Lichty is the first writer in Grand Arts’ history to deliver, ahead of the essay, a lengthy and painstakingly accurate transcript of conversations with the artist whose work he was writing about. Although this original transcript was never meant for publication, it contained a number of wonderful, revelatory exchanges between Baab and Lichty. It also indicted me as someone who doesn’t especially like cats. Despite this, I asked the two artists to revisit their conversation for Grand Arts’ blog, and they kindly obliged.

The following interview was conducted just before Baab’s solo exhibition at Grand Arts (SIDE A) and a few weeks after the exhibition’s opening (SIDE B). The conversation touches on some of the artists’ interests, influences, and practice. The parts about cat phobia and allergies have been excised for length.

S.S.

ANTHONY BAAB

STEPHEN LICHTY

SIDE A

A person isn’t always encouraged to look at art for a long time. Take Piero Manzoni’s Merda d’Artista, for example. You don’t need to look at that for a long time. It was made to be consumed fast. That’s not the case here. Here, there’s a lot to look at.

I remember looking at Andy Warhol drawings with a teacher in New York City. It was the reason we were in New York City, It was the one show he wanted to see, and he saw the whole show in thirty seconds. He just walked by and kind of glanced at everything. I said, “what’s up, are you okay?” He said, ‘it was a great show, I’m just ready to go.’

Thirty seconds, just walking by. So, I think there are these weird exceptions with what we do – we give art more time than it needs, or less time.

Have you ever felt guilt, or anxiety about not being productive in art?

Absolutely.

I used to harbor a lot of anxiety about not being productive, about not doing something worthwhile.

All the time. I don’t know where that comes from, but part of being an artist is making work and if I’m not making work I kind of feel like I’m wasting my time.

There’s no alternative to making work – it’s hard to think of doing something else. We discussed before that some of the most brilliant folks get out of art-making.

Some people want comfort, some people want security, some people want a relationship. You know, some people want a good job, a nice home, and I think with making art I feel like I’ve definitely had to make certain sacrifices to be able to have the time to do what I want to do.

Do you mean in interpersonal situations?

If you spend too much time in studio, then you’re not getting out enough, you’re not doing enough; you’re not seeing enough to begin to really cultivate a subject matter, to cultivate an idea. Think of studio in the traditional sense, like for me – think of studio as a cave. it’s where you produce. And you have to get out of the cave – you have experiences, you read things, you look at things – and when that stops you are just producing, and if you are just producing to produce, sometimes the work suffers as a result of that. It has for me.

How?

I guess what I’m saying is when you are in studio all the time and you are making things all the time and you don’t have time to do all the other things in life you should be doing – you never have that time to leave and think about something and come back and be critical and see something thru another lens. That thing you thought was wonderful is wonderful, but it’s really not. Does that make sense?

It’s like allegory of the cave.

Yes!

Sometimes, if people allow themselves to do the thing they shouldn’t be doing, it describes their unique offering to the world.

When you go to a place that is constructed specifically for work, you can go and you can work and you can work, work and work. You talk about that other aspect of being an artist, which is talking to people, scheduling shows, the professional side of making things, and studio isn’t that. When you’re in your studio, your studio tells you to work, it doesn’t tell you deadlines. I’m speaking for myself. It tells me to work, it doesn’t tell me when to finish, where it should go, whether it’s good or not, it just tells me to work.

Most of my work takes time. I take six months or so to make a piece, even though the work looks pretty fast. I usually only make a few things a year because it takes a lot of time. So, when I do have a studio, I clean the studio, I mop the floor, I put on music, I read something. Then I move the shelves. If I cut something, I clean up and put the thing I cut where I want it to be.

I like that. It’s maintenance. It’s your studio and you’ve got to keep the studio, studio.

The thing that is consistent, and that I’m proud of, is the shape of the studio. Come into my temple, this is how my house looks when I make all of the decisions!

I spend a lot of time here, and I’ve done a lot to make myself feel comfortable. I listen to a lot of music and take a lot of naps and walks. I have a fog machine that I’ll turn on sometimes to add ambiance. For two years I worked under black light. When I was in high school I turned my room into one giant collage; maybe that’s where these tendencies come from. Also, There’s something about incense. I burn a lot of frankincense and I burn a lot of champa.

Will you burn some?

Yeah. This stuff is really intense. Frankincense reminds me of being in church. I went to a Catholic church.

Regularly?

I went every week. I was a server.

Did you carry the front cross?

Yeah, did that.

Did you clean and wash the priests’ hands?

No, I never did that and I never did events. I never did funerals. But yeah, I don’t know what it is about incense, but I’ve been burning it for years and it really gets me in the zone (laughing).

How does this work [the incense]?

This is pretty much what the priest would do – this is charcoal and this is resin. What we’ll do is leave this open for a minute, and let it heat up, and then, when we have a lot of it, we’ll close it. This is really powerful if we leave it open to cook.

Music affects everything – it affects what I make – it affects the way things look. I can kind of tell what people listen to by the art they make. A friend of mine used to make fun of me all the time, ‘your work looks like metal album covers.’ and I’d say, “your work looks like Cat Power.” He does listen to Cat Power and he didn’t even tell me, you know? It’s funny. You can’t always, but sometimes.

There’s a band called, My Cat is an Alien.

I know that band.

Yeah, my cat is an alien, even though I’m familiar with it.

 

SIDE B

This session is going to be different because we don’t have any work in front of us to look at.

Yeah.

Are you having any postpartum depression from the show?

No. That’s what a couple of people mentioned – that I would get really depressed after the show. I got depressed before the show – not really depressed, but anxious. I haven’t had any problems since. I’ve been busy. Good things happening. School started, I’m teaching three classes. I’ve been putting together a lot of images – post-show stuff, working on the website and all that sort of stuff. It’s been good. I’ve been working in studio on some small works and thinking about ideas for two big projects. I’ve been pretty much occupied.

Big projects informed by what you’ve been working on?

My roommate and I have this idea to make a UFO. Also, I found some brochures in my hotel room during the weekend of the opening that I’m making work out of.

You mentioned that…

Yeah, I’ve been making collages out of these brochures. I’m really excited about them actually.

Is that the big project (laughing) ?

No, that’s the little project, the little stuff.

Do you follow alien research?

Alien stuff? No, I never really got that into sci-fi. My roommate is into that stuff. We were talking about Michael Ashkin’s work. He teaches at Cornell, makes beautiful cardboard models of things like prisons. He made this three dimensional version of an El Lissitzky painting.

We were talking about alien movies, what inspires the design of the UFO, and I found that really interesting. We were looking at pictures of spacecraft and UFO’s and I got really into looking at pictures of that stuff.

Are you looking up Ashkin’s work?

Yes. I like thinking about extremely small or non-anthropomorphic aliens, extraterrestrials that are either invisible forces or other-dimensional. I watched Prometheus recently.

I was actually thinking of Prometheus while we were having this conversation.

I recall some holographic data-blur representations of people running…

Kind of like Predator. Watching Prometheus was like watching a long Tool video.

I think I’ve seen more Tool T-shirts than videos in my life. (laughing)

There is this kind of music that I’m listening to…

Can you be more specific?

Dave Hickey gave a talk at SVA, The Good Ennui.  (click for video: http://bit.ly/WD5sXv)

The music is kind of random commercial tunes that are released thru these anonymous names. Some of them don’t even have titles. It’s music that is maybe taken from commercials, taken from elevator music, kind of cut-up. I was thinking about this talk that Hickey gave on the sublime, The Good Ennui, a type of boredom that becomes almost transcendental.

The brochures from the hotel – they are pictures of your bedding, the linens, the towels, the plants in the hotel. And they’re kind of beautiful, boring, quaint – I’m cutting them up kind of like the decollage works. If you cut ‘em up just right, you don’t actually see objects, the subject matter, you don’t see things like towels and tables and windows, you see a flow of lines and information – it becomes very formal. That cat video, I was thinking a lot about that Warhol Empire piece, and that’s something that Hickey brings up. He talks about this kind of everyday content feeling, like listening to AM radio – sitting on the back porch – that kind of thing. And I’m not sure what all this means to me yet, but I’m sort of thinking about it a little bit and how it may or may not relate to the stuff that I’m looking at.

So, I’m watching it [the cat footage] and I want to find the moment when there’s the most activity – where the cats are doing the most, they’re active, I see a lot of them, they’re all playing with the sculpture, moving around. There’s this constant anticipation watching the video, thinking that something is going to happen, and nothing happens. Then something happens and it’s really nothing – it’s a cat just jumping. It’s weird how immersed you get in cats that do so little. You know what I mean?

Yesterday I watched a documentary on Chuck Jones of Looney Tunes fame; he described the beauty and pleasure of holding a character in the air before gravity sets in – setting up the gag and holding it for as long as possible before fulfilling the prophesy.

That’s so funny, I watched about two and a half hours of Looney Tunes a few days ago.

What did you watch?

I started by watching Bugs Bunny, and all of the episodes with the character Bugsy. Was that his name – the mafia gangster?

Bugs Bunny as another character?

No, a separate character… Mugsy, that’s it. But I was also watching a lot of Wylie Coyote and Roadrunner.

I was trying to think of a word to describe the characters on Looney Tunes. I thought of the word “light” in thinking about those scenes where the coyote is suspended for a minute and then falls. It’s funny that there’s always the aggressor or antagonist in the show, but then there’s another antagonist that is an inanimate object, or the ground, and it’s always so heavy and hard, while they’re so light and fluffy and malleable. It’s funny to me. There’s a really good essay by Sianne Ngai, The Cuteness of the Avant Garde, that talks about dolls and how dolls and toys are designed so they can be crushed and immediately pop-back into form.

That’s special stuff. Looking back on it for the first time – for me anyway – some of the techniques they [Looney Tunes] use to break the third wall are amazing – characters getting chased around by animator’s erasers. They set up this antagonism – between the characters and the studio, which I believe echoed subtle antagonisms between the cartoon directors and the studio.

What do you mean by studio?

Warner Brothers Studio.

Some of the messages in Looney Tunes are pretty antagonistic, but coded with humor. That was a surprise looking back on the cartoons. Can we discuss humor and fantasy in your own work?

I think there is definitely a humor introduced to the work by the cats and that apparent connection to cat furniture. Some of the work in the show poses as this austere modern utopian machine-like object, and when you put these objects with cats, they lose their monumentality.

In poratrix seperates, I think I see carpet on the floor that has been vacuumed kind of haphazardly – is that what you see?

It’s actually rubber and it’s a dancefloor.

The floor has taken on some dust?

Yeah there are footprints on it.

I misread the image, seeing the way light would bounce off differentially vacuumed carpet. The detail made me laugh out loud.

They deflate the work. The vacuum lines, the cats, the context.

Is there anything you feel people haven’t talked about regarding the work? Something that’s been missed? Sometimes an artist holds secrets.

I had an idea that I don’t think came up very much in conversation that I’m still trying to flesh out myself – two ideas that I think are linked. One has to do with the idea of a machine – of a machine as a sort of spirit, as a picture, as a kind of attitude. The machine, I think, is somewhat in line with Modernism – a way to be, a way to act, a way to structure things.

Are you referring to industrial-revolution style machinery, or machination in general?

I mean a machine as an object. You think of the Internet, for instance. It’s a difficult example of a machine because so many of its components are not visible. We can see images that it produces, but as a machine it’s so difficult to see. We think of locomotives as a machine. We think of airplanes as a machine, the supercollider. But the idea of a type of future that we can attach an image to, that we can attach an icon to, really interests me.

Let’s talk about portability – I’m not exactly sure why but the video stream is more portable for me than the other work. The video is easier to describe. It’s on-topic.

On-topic?

It’s easy to talk about. People like to hear about it. It’s easier to describe than any single image. If it were described by a number of different people, I think it would be described in pretty much the same way. That is different than the photographs. That’s part of it – as a set of words, it can travel, it is functional. It is machine-like – it functions. There is a structure, there are animals, there is a camera, and we kind of already know that and we understand it, and that’s shared, so the piece is easy to imagine.

Well, what about the fact that the work is more close to the present than the pictures are? Not sure if that’s a fact, but… the pictures occurred for a moment, unknown, but the video was a live stream. People asked me, is this something that’s going to occur for the duration of the show – are these cats going to remain for the duration of the show? And you watch the video and I would think that one might presume that could occur – that that could continue, and it makes it portable because it is continuing to happen. After you are away from it, it is continuing.

Somehow, photography asks to be looked at while video, here, doesn’t need us. With photography you present a single moment in time-space and foreground that – those photographs are monumental in that way, a kind of creme de la creme of time-space and architecture. But watching the video and the cats on it was a little bit closer to how I experienced the floodgate we went to, for example, near Kaw Point. It’s about hanging out.

Yeah. I’m sometimes, with this work, thinking about how photography, video and painting simultaneously show and conceal. It has a front and it has a back, whereas, with a sculpture…

…you get to touch more faces.

I’m kind of interested in this idea right now – the idea of a photo that doesn’t have a front and a back, or even maybe a side, if possible. Another thing that never really came up is the decollage works as something between a sculptural object and a picture, a relief.

I experience historical relief as an enhanced representational technique. The omnipresent, n-th dimensional photography you are referring to, somehow strives to go beyond representation. If you have a photograph that has no front, back or sides, you have a seeing sculpture.

A seeing sculpture? Those attributes that we assign to photography pertaining to the gaze, or seeing back, or being assertive would become the things that translate toward… so it would be a sculpture basically.

I want the McCracken plinth to be cognoscente, aware, smart, to see. It’s also kind of terrifying – it would be terrifying to have a photograph that didn’t have a front or back or sides.

Yeah, when I was building the sculpture I thought a lot about the panopticon. Did we talk about that?

No, but I can see that.

It’s kind of like Cubism in a way, but not as a representation of the subject, but rather a declaration of media.

What is like Cubism?

This idea of omnipresence in art. The idea of being able to see things from multiple places at once.

I want to point to an excerpt from a book called The Media Archive by Adilkno, published by Autonomedia, the book is very rich – the excerpt has something to do with everything becoming media.

Media became global and universal. Just as God was spread across continents by missionaries and crusades, and humans were later held responsible for all the abundance and misery in the world, so the media are now omnipresent. Every place is instantaneously represented everywhere via satellite and fiberglass; a global view is the only international perspective that remains. At the same time, every object

has the capacity to become a medium. Clothes, crockery, furniture, the city have become the media of a national politico-sexual identity and Zeitgeist. They are the thermometers of mental states. Trees inform us about wind force and environmental pollution. Everything transmits meaning; everything provides us with information about something other than itself. Where before there were objects, now there is information. There exists no other reality except as media.

Already, there are signs of a movement that, out of pure enthusiasm for an image-free society, will reintroduce socialism as a ban on images to be included in the declaration of universal human rights based on Judeo-Islamic Scripture. Just as the death of God rendered religion a private affair, so the image will become a matter of personal experience which, at best, will organize itself into secret societies of heretical mediatists. The implosion of reality in the media has been adequately recorded and proclaimed. The ban on images will cause a chain reaction: the descent of the media into reality. We will be amazed to find ourselves back in a world full of objects that no longer exude messages.

Socialism, unwarranted by historical-materialist laws, will establish itself in the emptiness of the postmedial era. An object-orientated communism will reign in an image-free society.

(http://thing.desk.nl/bilwet/adilkno/TheMediaArchive/49.txt)

When was this written? After hearing that  the idea of using photography as a medium seems silly. So many possibilities.

1998. But your photography pushes back at the assumptions about photography. It is precarious and pretty up-front about that. I don’t feel like the work you have exhibited is so much of a celebration for capturing life through photography.

I watched Jurassic Park last night – it was amazing. Have you watched that recently?

No, but a friend told me that currently, salmon are being crossbred with eel because the hybrid grows much faster. When asked how to keep the genetically modified fish from entering natural habitats, the representative said not to worry because they had engineered the species to be only female (laughing). The Jurassic Park argument. Life will find a way!

Anthony Baab is a Kansas City-based artist. After receiving his BFA in painting from the Kansas City Art Institute in 2004, Baab went on to study interdisciplinary art at Cornell University, graduating in 2009 with his MFA. Baab’s  works have been shown frequently, including exhibitions at Tompkins Projects in Brooklyn, NY, Nerman Museum of Contemporary Art in Overland Park, KS, The Dolphin in Kansas City, MO, and at the Cornell University College of Architecture and Art. In 2006 Baab was a recipient of the Charlotte Street Foundation Award. His work is in the collections of the Nelson Atkins Museum of Art, Kansas City, MO, the Nerman Museum of Contemporary Art, Overland Park, KS, and the Microsoft Art Collection in Richmond, WA.

Stephen Lichty is an artist based in New York. His sculptures have been exhibited at Jack Chiles and Foxy Production in New York (2012), New Capital in Chicago (2012) and Frutta in Rome (2012). Recent performances include Special Effects at ODC in San Francisco (2012) and Ribbon Dance in a Thunderstorm at Sunset at Socrates Sculpture Park in New York (2012).

Opening night of Anthony Baab’s A Strenuous Nonbeing brought out a fantastic crowd. Gallery-goers were steady throughout the night, eager to see the fruit of Anthony’s labor over the past couple of years.

It was fantastic to be able to finally see how people responded to Anthony’s intense and mysterious work. We’ve had a great time talking to visitors and getting their unique perspectives on the exhibition as they’ve come through the gallery over the past weeks!

A Strenuous Nonbeing remains on view until March 30. Gallery hours are Thursday and Friday from 10am to 5 pm and Saturdays from 11am to 5pm or by appointment. We are happy to give tours to your class or other group. To do so, please write to gallery@grandarts.com to schedule a visit.

We hope to see you here!

Opening night visitors getting a look at Anthony's work.

Visitor looking at the inkjet print "etraphy fore"

Visitors cat-watching in the exhibition's titular video

A talk with Baab, essayist Stephen Lichty, and Grand Arts Artistic Director Stacy Switzer brought out a sizable crowd on the Saturday after the opening.

We have excerpted a small portion of Anthony Baab’s video A Strenuous Nonbeing. The video was captured during a live feed that was streamed to Grand Arts during the opening of Anthony’s exhibition that shares the video’s title. The entire piece, along with the rest of the work that comprises this new body of work, will be on view at Grand Arts until March 30.

Last Friday Grand Arts said farewell to Sissel Tolaas’ SmellScape KCK/KCMO exhibition with an award ceremony honoring the highest scoring players of the SmellScape game.

The ceremony was an excellent sendoff to the exhibition. It was great to bring together our dedicated SmellScape sniffers and hear about their experiences of following their noses through town.

The always amazing project assistant Charlie Mylie dressed for the occasion as a human nose

The competition was fierce, with 8 players making it to our Silver Sniffer Circle- with the runner-up being awarded the Silver Nose and the highest scoring player winning the Golden Nose.

Visitors enjoy the smell bar for a final time

 

 

Lacey, Garret, and Seth announce the names of the Silver Sniffers

Below are listed the names of the Silver Sniffer Circle followed by their scores:

Gretegoo: 8th Place with 3446 Sniff Points

The Nielsen Parents: 7th Place with 3456 Sniff Points

Giannico: 6th Place with 3460 Sniff Points

Lexi Dingli-Attard: 5th Place with 3462 Sniff Points

Victoria and Aliyah: 4th Place with 3464 Sniff Points

The Nielsen Kids: 3rd Place with 3485 Sniff Points

Sissel herself was Skyped in from her home-base in Berlin, Germany to announce the second and first place award winners:

Second Place: Christina and Benjamin

First Place: Karen Workman

A beaming Sissel appears on Skype to present the frst and second place winners

 

Runners-up Victoria and Aliyah

Second place winner Benjamin of Benjamin and Christina is presented with their award

Karen Workman receives her hard-won Golden Nose for winning first place!

First and second place winners take their places on the podium

The grand prizes: the Golden Nose and the Silver Nose. Designed by Grand Arts and fabricated by Erica Voetsch at Jewelry By Design

We wanted also to share pictures of this special artifact that Second Place winners Christina and Benjamin created during their time playing the SmellScape game:

Lastly, we would like to extend a huge thank you to our SmellScape KCK/KCMO  collaborators, without whom this project would have been impossible:

We also want to extend a big thank you to our SmellScape KCK/KCMO collaborators: Kansas City Municipal Court, City Market, Kansas City Museum, Kansas City Kansas Public Library Main Branch, The Unified Government of Wyandotte County/Kansas City Kansas Parks and Recreation, Friends of Kaw Point, Los Tules Food Truck, St. Mary’s Episcopal Church, Steamboat Arabia Museum, Chinatown Food Market, Al Habashi Mart, Lou Lou’s, Rich’s Wash and Dry, Epic Arts Clay Studio, Dalia’s Belleza Estetica Familiar, Supermart El Torito II, La Michoacana, and Ed’s Trophies and Awards.

Thank you also to our project assistants Megan Mantia and Charlie Mylie, Sarabeth Dunton, App Designer and Project Consultants Garrett Fuselier and Daniel Goggin, to our intern from KCAI Carolina Aranibar Fernandez, Sound Designer Christopher Good, essay writer and project researcher Annie Fischer, gold/silver nose maker Erica Voetsch and the KC-inspired DJ of the Award Ceremony, Shawn Hanson.

The opening for Sissel Tolaas’ SmellScape KCK/KCMO 2005-2011 went off without a hitch!

In addition to our usual opening event at Grand Arts, we also held opening events at the Kansas City Kansas Public Library and Kaw Point Park, two of the many fantastic collaborators with whom we worked on the SmellScape project.

Trollies shuttled gallery goers between Grand Arts and our satellite locations.

The Kansas City Public Library's Central Branch graciously hosted a reception there with a special lecture by Sissel Tolaas.

The library had even set up their own smell game for visitors to play!

SmellScape collaborator La Michoacana provided delicious paletas for visitors to enjoy.

Kaw Point Park was lively with activity, including Lewis and Clark reenactors and Kurt Flecksing's fantastic S'mores Cart!

The following Saturday Sissel talked about her work and its relationship to the psychology of smell before leading a walk with local artist and poet Jose Faus.

Starting at the City Museum, Sissel and Jose took the group on a fascinating walk around Kansas City's historic Northeast to discuss understanding neighborhoods using one's nose.

The walk was capped off with a drop in at El Paso del Norte Pasteleria, where many delicious Mexican pastries were consumed by the walkers!

We wish to thank all of those who turned out for these opening weekend events. It was a great privilege to have Sissel in town to host these activities, and we were excited to see so many come out to participate! Thank you all for bringing your curiosity with you to learn more about what the nose knows!

Special thanks to Megan Mantia for taking all the photo documentation.


We stationed a docent to be on-site during our regularly scheduled gallery hours to offer information about the piece and to collect visitors’ various responses. Our docents were Eric Dobbins, founder of Wonderfair gallery in Lawrence, KS; Kansas City Art Institute student Katy McRoberts; and community artist John Hilger, who is a veteran of the United States Marine Corps.

The docents were encouraged to engage visitors- both those who appeared specifically to see the piece, and those just happening across it while enjoying the park- in order to collect opinions and discuss thoughts about the work, its creation, and whatever other issue might be brought up.

The docents offered visitors the choice of one of three buttons as a memento. These buttons gave the docents an opportunity to break the ice by offering a gift, but also served as something like a casual ballot- a viewer’s choice of buttons offered possible insight into her or his perspective about the work. This was, admittedly, a rather unscientific method for gathering reactions, but it served to be useful in catalyzing conversation about all kinds of topics- from the economy to patriotism to the complexities of the Federal Reserve bank.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The docents were given digital recorders to document responses, a few of which we would like to share here. We were thrilled by the diversity of responses, which ranged from enthusiasm to disgust- both about the piece itself and the perceived necessity or frivolity of a piece as audacious as this one. Given that one stated goal of IOU/USA was to generate discussion, we wish to share the following responses collected during its brief lifetime:

Here is the Music Player. You need to installl flash player to show this cool thing!

Here is the Music Player. You need to installl flash player to show this cool thing!

Here is the Music Player. You need to installl flash player to show this cool thing!


Thursday, September 8

Retired Navy Officer, 20 yrs. in the service:

“Well, I like it. I like things with whimsy. You’re gonna die any day so you can’t take things so serious. And ten minutes after you die, no one will give a damn. Hell, maybe five minutes.”

Refused buttons and pamphlet.

Two Ladies Walking:

One takes IOU button and asks, “Is this art?”

Runner:

“What is it?” 

I explain briefly as he runs past.

“I think it’s weird! I think it’s wonderful!”

Here is the Music Player. You need to installl flash player to show this cool thing!

Here is the Music Player. You need to installl flash player to show this cool thing!

Thursday, September 15

Mother and Son walking dog:

Mother takes USA.

Child (8ish) takes IOU.

John, from Minnesota:

“I like the pamphlet a lot; it answered all of the questions I had about the work. I think it’s very appropriate for the location, by the Fed.”

Group just exiting the Money Museum, Woman from Texas and couple from Springfield. Texan is holding a bag of shredded bills from the Museum. Woman from Texas:

“I think its a shame something like this has to be up, but its true.”

[Motions toward the IOU.]

Woman takes IOU.Couple takes all 3 buttons.

Unknown male:

“Is it art?” [Reading pamphlet and sign.] “They tried to fight it? The Fed tried to fight it. That speaks with a loud voice right there. Someone needs to call Fox News and get them down here to do a story.”

Asked to take 3 IOU/USA buttons, and 1 USA.

Silver sports car driving by:

“GET A LIFE!”

Three women powerwalking:

“I can’t wait until they get rid of that thing!”

Companion: “SHHH!”

Here is the Music Player. You need to installl flash player to show this cool thing!

Did you visit the site of IOU/USA? Did it spark any thoughts for you? If so, we welcome you to share them-positive, negative, or otherwise- in the comments section below.

Interested artists should take a look at this great opportunity:

Applications Open for 2nd Edition of of the Future Generation Art Prize

Following its successful launch in 2009 with more than 6,000 applicants from all continents, the PinchukArtCentre has established partnerships with more than 50 international non-profit art organizations for the second edition of the Future Generation Art Prize.
The Partner Platforms are based in over than 38 countries and will help to support outreach to artists around the world. The Partner Platforms also demonstrate the Prize’s global network and effort to involve artists from different regions around the world, especially growing regions such as South America, Australia, Africa, and Oceania.

In increasing the number of Partner Platforms, the PinchukArtCentre strives to globalize the Future Generation Art Prize and reinforces the democratic and international character of the Prize. Above all, it ensures a network of institutions that will communicate with and urge artists from their regions to participate.

In addition, with 300 correspondents throughout the world, the FGAP intends to engage young artists under 35 from wherever they may live and work.

Eckhard Schneider, General Director, PinchukArtCentre (Kyiv, Ukraine): “50 partner platforms all over the world show the essential idea of the Future Generation Art Prize: Think and act global and local at the same time.”

The Future Generation Art Prize was established in 2009 by the Victor Pinchuk Foundation to discover and provide long-term support for a generation of emerging artists up to 35, wherever they may live and work. This unique artist-focused prize aims to make a major contribution toward the production of new work by young artists.

Awarded through an open and democratic competition, judged by a distinguished international jury, the Prize is founded on the idea of generosity, a network of outstanding patron artists and institutional partners, and a highly democratic application procedure.

Applications for the Future Generation Art Prize 2012 will be available online February 6 – May 6, 2012, at the Prize website.

An exhibition of 21 shortlisted artists will open at the PinchukArtCentre (Kyiv, Ukraine) in October 2012. The respected international jury will announce the winner of the Main Prize who will receive a generous prize ($60,000 in cash and $40,000 toward production of new work) at the Award Ceremony in December 2012 in Kyiv (Ukraine). An award of $20,000 from the Foundation will be allotted to fund artist-in-residency programs to the winner of the Special Prize.
To encourage this new generation of artists, a group of renowned Mentor Artists has committed its long-term participation in the Prize. These artists will provide in-person counsel and support to the prize winners, and one of the Mentor artists will have a parallel show at the same time as each shortlist exhibition. The 2012 Mentor Artists are Andreas Gursky, Damien Hirst, Jeff Koons and Takashi Murakami.

A distinguished international Board oversees the Future Generation Art Prize. In addition to chairman Victor Pinchuk and the four Mentor Artists, the Board’s membership includes Eli Broad, Dakis Joannou, Elton John, Miuccia Prada and art museum directors Richard Armstrong (Solomon R. Guggenheim Foundation and Museum), Glenn D. Lowry (The Museum of Modern Art), Alfred Pacquement (Muse?e nationale d’art moderne, Centre Georges Pompidou) and Sir Nicholas Serota (Tate).

Have a look at these exciting photos of IOU/USA by John Salvest during its installation in Memorial Hill Park. The sculpture was on view 24 hours a day from September 2 – October 16, 2011.

All images and captions by the artist. Click to enlarge the images.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

First 40’ container is placed after site at Penn Valley/Memorial Hill Park is surveyed, excavated and leveled.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The first course is carefully placed. The integrity of the structure is dependent upon a level foundation.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Completion of first course with Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City in the background.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

As per Federal Reserve requirements, each container is inspected, recorded and locked in the presence of Reserve security officers.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Grand Arts’ E.J. Holland helps get the second row started.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Belger Cartage crane crew setting an NOL container.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Corner connectors secure each container to another.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

20’ containers are used to account for textual discrepancies between the IOU and USA sides.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

With World War I Memorial in background, the crane operator picks a container from the staging area.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

A Hyundai container finishes out the third level.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Looking from the west, the project begins to assert its presence before the Federal Reserve building.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

As the structure rises, its message slowly reveals itself.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The final course nears completion.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

View of IOU/USA as it is approached from the Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

View of the War Memorial and downtown Kansas City from atop IOU/USA.